-
Photographs: ‘Dream Big Dreams’
Here are two photographs pulled from the White House Flickr stream. I like both of them for very different reasons. I hope you enjoy them also.
This is an “Official White House Photo” taken by Pete Souza. President Obama and Jon Favreau, head speechwriter, edit a speech on health care in the Oval Office, Sept. 9, 2009, in preparation for the president’s address to a joint session of Congress. As a writer and editor, I just love to see the mark-ups. There’s a creative elegance to it.
This photo’s also by Pete Souza. It shows Obama’s signature on a wall in a health classroom at Southwest High School in Green Bay, Wisconsin, June 11, 2009. The staff at the school, where the President attended a town hall meeting on health care, left a note asking him to sign the wall for future students to see. He wrote, “Dream big dreams” (or perhaps “Dream hip dreams,” which also is cool with me).
-
Happy Birthday, Gloria Steinem!
“The truth will set you free. But first, it will piss you off.”–Gloria Steinem
Feminist and journalist, Gloria Steinem was a key figure in the women’s movement from 1969. She founded Ms. magazine, starting in 1972. She is an outspoken advocate for the Equal Rights Amendment and helped found the National Women’s Political Caucus.
I met Ms. Steinem in New York City at a Women’s Funding Network gathering fundraiser in 2007. Happy birthday, Gloria (who turns 76 today) — and thank you.
-
BBC’s Two Part Show on Archbishop Oscar Romero
The BBC’s Heart and Soul ran an incredible 2-part radio show on Oscar Romero this week on the 30th anniversary of Romero’s assassination. Join Julian Miglierini as he speaks to those who remember Romero, and travels to a village in El Salvador’s poor north, where he is revered as a saint.“Thirty years ago, El Salvador’s Catholic Archbishop Oscar Romero was shot dead while celebrating mass. He knew he was in danger – not long before his death, he said that if he was killed – he would rise again in his people. Today, his face is everywhere in the country – on murals, T-shirts and key rings. Many compare him to Martin Luther King, Gandhi or even Che Guevara.
But how was it that this man of the church became such an outspoken advocate of the poor and oppressed? And why did he become such a threat to the rich oligarchy that someone wanted him dead?Listen to BBC’s Julian Miglierini as he speaks to those who remember Romero, and travels to a village in El Salvador’s poor north, where he is revered as a saint.”
BBC’s Heart and Soul Part I (28 minutes).
Every year on 24th March, the people of El Salvador remember the death of the man who throughout Latin America became known as the voice of the voiceless poor: Catholic Archbishop Oscar Romero, who was shot dead at the altar on 24th March 1980. But is the Catholic church he loved in terminal decline, in a country where more than one-third of the population now attend evangelical Protestant churches?
BBC’s Julian Miglierini goes to a Baptist megachurch in San Salvador where close to 80,000 people worship every week, and asks why its message should have such enormous appeal in a traditionally Catholic country. But while the Catholic church may be losing members, Oscar Romero himself seems to have lost little of his appeal. El Salvador’s new left-wing President, Mauricio Funes, calls him his inspiration. And this bookish Archbishop in his 60s has also become an unlikely icon of youth culture. Hear why the Hip Hop band, Pescozada, have just released a track in homage to him.
BBC’s Heart and Soul Part II (28 minutes).
-
Romero: When the Word of God Gets Under Your Skin
“A church that doesn’t provoke any crisis, a gospel that doesn’t unsettle, a word of God that doesn’t get under anyone’s skin, a word of God that doesn’t touch the real sin of the society in which it is being proclaimed, what kind of gospel is that? Very nice, pious considerations that don’t bother anyone, that is the way many would like preaching to be. Those preachers who avoid every thorny matter so as not to be harassed, so as not to have conflicts and difficulties do not light up the world they live in. … The gospel is courageous; it’s the good news of him who came to take away the world’s sins.”—Archbishop Oscar Romero (murdered March 24, 1980)From The Violence of Love: The Pastoral Wisdom of Archbishop Oscar Romero, edited by James R. Brockman
-
Caprica: Does a Robot Have a Soul? (Episode 2)
Back in February I posted about the new SciFi hit Caprica. Since I don’t have cable TV, I’m catching the show as I can when the episodes are uploaded to the Syfy channel Web site.Episode 2 – Rebirth spent a lot of time establishing the connection between the Cylon robot and Zoe’s avatar. The change in camera so that the viewer sometimes sees out of Zoe’s eyes and sometimes sees the Cylon robot was oddly off-putting. Rather than increasing empathy for Zoe and emphasizing her sense of separation locked inside the Cylon body, the effect served more to just dislocate the viewer. But I’m intrigued that Zoe’s religious “sense of mission” in getting to the planet Gemanon where her monotheistic community will welcome her is still intact even as her avatar is downloaded into the Cylon body.
The other fascinating scene in this episode is the mass memorial gathering after the terrorist attack. Amanda Greystone takes the stage and announces that her daughter, Zoe, was one of the terrorists. This sparks a riot in the crowd and Amanda barely escapes. I found this scene both emotionally moving and somehow false. Amanda Greystone is a smart woman of achievement; a doctor, researcher, and scientist. Yes, she’s under emotional stress from her daughter’s death – but it doesn’t seem believable that she would take the stage for a public confession or that her husband (a futuristic Bill Gates) and his handlers would “let” it happen.
As I mentioned before, there’s a great conversation on the ethics, religion, and spirituality in Caprica going on over at Religion Dispatches. Here are a few quotes responding to Episode 2:
Diane Winston writes: Caprica’s landscape is littered with families that aren’t families. The gifted Graystones don’t communicate. Alone in their aerie, Daniel and Amanda jealously guard memories of their daughter. How could Daniel not mention the avatar? Why would Amanda hide her concerns about Zoe’s loyalties? Life is no easier in the Adams’ apartment where the adults pull in different directions. Grandma yearns for the old country; Joe for new beginnings. No wonder young Bill grows up to find community, purpose and identity in the military’s ranks. High Priestess Clarice Willow’s polygamous household looks like it might offer something better: big love and shared purpose. But the profusion of furtive glances and angry accusations give lie to what is heralded as an extended family. Even “found” families are treacherous. Zoe kept secrets from Lacy, Lacy deserts Zoe and Ben when they run away, Ben kills Zoe in his holy holocaust. I can only wonder what kind of family Zoe hoped to find on Gemenon.
Henry Jenkins writes: I continue to be intrigued by Caprica’s ongoing exploration of media and the effects of mediation. I don’t just mean the central representations of artificial consciousness and virtual worlds, but also more mundane forms of media practices which show how information gets recorded and transmitted. This week, for example, we have some throwaway lines about Uncle Sam Adama’s tattoos, which we are told signal to others in his community who he is and what he has done. His “tats” are a kind of information appliance which has been inked directly onto his body—and indeed, this is often the way tattoos function in contemporary criminal societies—as markers of affiliation, as statements of fidelity, and as records of accomplishments. Is there any parallels to be drawn here between how memories are imprinted through Sam’s tatoos and the ways that Zoe’s memories are imprinted onto computer chips for example?
Read more from Capricology here.
-
Listen to Latino USA this Weekend – What’s “Preferential Option for the Poor”?
While preparing for an interview on the radio show Latino USA (to air on NPR stations on the weekend of March 26,27,27), I put together some notes on this question about what it means to have a “preferential option for the poor.” Show host Maria Hinojosa asked me and theologian Ernesto Valiente to speak about the 30th anniversary of Archbishop Romero’s assassination and on what “option for the poor” the life and faith of people today.The option for the poor is a basic principles of Catholic Social Teaching. It was a fundamental principle embraced by the Catholic Bishops of Latin America at conferences both in Medellin (1968) and Puebla (1979).
As a developed theological principle it was further articulated by the Dominican priest Gustavo Gutierrez in A Theology of Liberation. The principle is rooted in both the Old and New Testaments and claims that a preferential concern for the physical and spiritual welfare of the poor is an essential element of the gospel.
The justice of a society is tested and judged by its treatment of the poor. God’s covenant with Israel was dependent on the way the community treated the poor and unprotected—the widow, the orphan and the stranger (Deut. 16.11-12, Ex. 22.21-27, Isa. 1.16-17). Throughout Israel’s history and in the New Testament, the poor are agents of God’s transforming power. In the gospel of Luke, Jesus proclaims that he has been anointed to bring good news to the poor (4.1-22). Similarly, in the Last Judgment, we are told that we will be judged according to how we respond to the hungry, the thirsty, the prisoner and the stranger (Matthew 25.31-46).
To understand the “poor” in the Bible as a reference to spiritual poverty only is to miss an important message. Indeed, faith without an understanding of justice for the poor is a gospel full of holes—incomplete and in tatters. Now, as in biblical times, financial poverty and spiritual poverty grow up together—but not in the way Christianized capitalism has told us the story.
Material poverty does not occur because one is spiritually poor. Rather, in a society where there are extremes of wealth and poverty, there exists a general spiritual poverty experienced by all. When the wealthy are dying from diseases of overabundance and the poor are dying from inadequate health care, poor diets, and stress-related illnesses, there is a spiritual disease in the society as a whole. How do Christians address poverty in all its forms?
Some Christians are confused on why the gospels demand that we give special attention to the poor—or as Catholic theology puts it, why we have a “preferential option for the poor.” It is not because God loves the poor more than the rich. It is not because God’s salvation is limited in any way. It’s because in order for us to have the society that God intended—one that protects all human dignity—then the needs of the poor take priority over the desires of the rich when making personal, communal, and political decisions.
“Option” in this sense is to be read as a verb, not a noun. Every Christian must choose, make a conscious choice to prioritize the needs of vulnerable over the needs of the secure. It’s how we keep our souls and conscience in shape. (See Economic Justice for All: Pastoral Letter on Catholic Social Teaching and the U.S. Economy by the U.S. Catholic Bishops, 1986).






